Psalter lessons · Psalm 130

Out of the Depths

Eight verses, and the whole of the gospel is in the joint between the third and the fourth. The psalm asks the one question no one can answer — if God kept the record, who could stand? — and then does not answer it. It says something else instead: there is forgiveness with him. Everything after that is a man learning to wait.

Text
Authorised Version; Hebrew from the Masoretic text
Superscription
A Song of degrees
Hinge
Verse 4 — “But there is forgiveness with thee”
Memory verse
“But there is forgiveness with thee, that thou mayest be feared.” (v. 4)

The Psalm

A Song of degrees.

  1. Out of the depths have I cried unto thee, O LORD.
  2. Lord, hear my voice: let thine ears be attentive to the voice of my supplications.
  3. If thou, LORD, shouldest mark iniquities, O Lord, who shall stand?
  4. But there is forgiveness with thee, that thou mayest be feared.
  5. I wait for the LORD, my soul doth wait, and in his word do I hope.
  6. My soul waiteth for the Lord more than they that watch for the morning: I say, more than they that watch for the morning.
  7. Let Israel hope in the LORD: for with the LORD there is mercy, and with him is plenteous redemption.
  8. And he shall redeem Israel from all his iniquities.

Setting and occasion

The superscription is three words long and it is the only thing the psalm volunteers about itself: A Song of degrees, שִׁיר הַמַּעֲלוֹת — a song of the goings-up. Fifteen psalms carry it, Psalms 120 to 134, and they travel as a set: a short, plain, portable collection with nothing in it that needs a choir. Four of the fifteen name David and one names Solomon. This is not one of them. What the degrees are has three standing answers — the pilgrim roads up to Jerusalem for the three feasts, “whither the tribes go up” (Ps. 122:4); the fifteen steps in the temple between the court of the women and the court of Israel, on which the Levites are said to have sung them (Mishnah, Middoth 2:5); and the going up out of Babylon. The first carries the collection best and does not exclude the rest. It matters here only for one reason: this is a travelling psalm, written to be sung by people who are on their way somewhere and are not there yet.

The church gave it a second name from the first two words of the Latin, De profundis clamavi ad te, Domine — Psalm 129 in the Vulgate’s numbering, and the De profundis ever after. It is the sixth of the seven penitential psalms (6, 32, 38, 51, 102, 130 and 143), a grouping already in use in the sixth century, when Cassiodorus names them, and fixed in Western devotion from then on. Its particular home became the burial of the dead — the Office of the Dead, the graveside, the prayer said for the departed — which is a fair instinct about a psalm that begins in the deep and ends in redemption, though it has the side-effect of making people think the psalm is about dying. It is not. It is about a living man with a bad conscience.

Beyond that, the psalm withholds everything. No author, no occasion, no enemy, no city, no year, and no account of what the depths are. The ma’amaqqim of verse 1 are the deep waters of Psalm 69 — the flood, the mire, the place where a man cannot stand — but here the metaphor is left standing empty, and the reader is not told what filled it. Verse 3 makes a reasonable guess possible: whatever else is in the depths with him, his own iniquities are. As with Psalm 62, the anonymity is not a gap in the record but a feature of the writing. A psalm that named its trouble could be sung by the people who share it. This one can be sung by anybody who is in any depth at all, which is why it has been.

One thing in the psalm is invisible in translation and worth pointing at before the exposition begins, because the lesson keeps returning to it. Psalm 130 moves between the two divine names more tightly than any psalm in this series. Five times it says the covenant name — יְהוָה in verses 1, 5 and twice in 7, and its short form יָהּ in verse 3 — and three times it says אֲדֹנָי, my Master, in verses 2, 3 and 6. Verse 3 has both, in that order, in one line. The Authorised Version marks the difference by case: LORD in small capitals for the covenant name, Lord in ordinary case for the other. Read the psalm aloud and the alternation does something the argument needs. The man cries to the God who made promises, and asks his questions of the God who owns him.

The shape of the psalm

The psalm is eight verses in four couplets, and the couplets are so clean that nobody argues about them: the cry (1–2), the question and its answer (3–4), the waiting (5–6), the summons to Israel (7–8). There is no Selah to divide it and no refrain to hold it together. What holds it together is a verb, used in two senses, which the Authorised Version is obliged to translate two different ways.

VerseHebrewAVWhat the pattern is doing
3תִּשְׁמָר“if thou shouldest mark iniquities”To keep, to guard, to keep a watch on — here, to keep the record.
6שֹׁמְרִים“they that watch for the morning”The same root, twice in one verse, of men keeping watch through a night.
3, 8עֲוֹנוֹת“iniquities”The inclusio. The word the question is asked with is the word the psalm ends by removing — all of them.
4הַסְּלִיחָה“but there is forgiveness with thee”The forgiveness, with the article. Not a quality God has; the thing itself, and it is with him.
7הַחֶסֶד“with the LORD there is mercy”The mercy, with the article — the second of the pair, and the reason Israel is told to hope.

Take the first two rows together, because that is the psalm’s spine. In verse 3 God is asked not to שׁמר iniquities — not to keep them, watch them, hold them on file. In verse 6 the man himself is שֹׁמְרִים, one of the watchers, keeping his watch through the dark for a morning he is sure of. The AV has to say mark in the one place and watch in the other, and the English reader never sees that the psalm has turned the same word around. The logic it hides is the logic of the whole psalm: because God does not keep watch over sins, a man is free to keep watch for God. Nothing else in the eight verses does as much work.

Around that spine the psalm moves like this.

VersesMovementSpoken to
1–2Out of the depths, a cry — and then a request that it be heardGod
3The question: if the record were kept, who could stand?God, about everyone alive
4Not the answer to that question, but another sentence entirely: “there is forgiveness with thee” — and its purpose, “that thou mayest be feared”God
5–6Waiting, waiting, hoping in his word; the watchmen, said twiceHimself, about God
7The seam. “Let Israel hope” — the first person disappears and the nation is addressedIsrael
8The ground of that hope: he himself shall redeem Israel from all his iniquitiesIsrael

Two things in that third column are worth naming now. The first is that the psalm never turns to face an enemy — there is no one in it but the man and God until verse 7, and then the congregation. The second is the seam itself. Up to verse 6 every verb is first person singular: I have cried, I wait, my soul waits, my soul waiteth. From verse 7 there is no I left in the psalm at all. What a man found in the depths he turns round and hands to the nation, in the imperative — and the word he hands over, יַחֵל, hope, is the same word he used of himself in verse 5. It is not a second centre, and it does not get the gold rule. It is the psalm doing in public what it has just done in private.

Part IOut of the depths vv. 1–4

vv. 1–2The cry, and the ears

מִמַּעֲמַקִּים קְרָאתִיךָ יְהוָה אֲדֹנָי שִׁמְעָה בְקוֹלִי

“Out of deep places I have called thee, LORD. Lord, hearken to my voice.”

The first word is the whole situation, and it is a word about water. מַעֲמַקִּים is deep places — from the root for depth — and the Old Testament uses it four other times, every one of them bolted to something wet: “I am come into deep waters” and “let me be delivered … out of the deep waters” (Ps. 69:2, 14), “the depths of the sea” (Isa. 51:10), “in the depths of the waters” (Ezek. 27:34). Psalm 130 is the one place it stands by itself. No sea is named, no flood, no river. The psalm hands you the word for drowning and then declines to say what the water is.

That silence is deliberate and the lesson should not fill it in too quickly. Preachers reach for grief, or illness, or persecution, and any of those will do, because the psalm has been left open on purpose — but it is worth making the room wait one verse. When the psalm finally does say what is in the deep with him, in verse 3, it is not his circumstances. It is his iniquities.

The verb is a perfect: קְרָאתִיךָ, I have called thee. The crying is not being announced, it is being reported; the psalm opens at some point after the shouting started. And he calls out of the depths, not from a safe distance above them. Nothing in these two verses suggests a man who has waited to be in better condition before he prays. He is still in the water when he opens his mouth.

Then verse 2, which does something strange if you are used to thinking of prayer as self-expression: having cried, he now asks to be heard. שִׁמְעָה בְקוֹלִי — hear in my voice — and then a request about God’s ears. Let thine ears be attentive. קַשֻּׁבוֹת is a rare word, and where else it turns up is worth knowing: Solomon uses it at the dedication of the temple — “let thine ears be attent unto the prayer that is made in this place” (2 Chr. 6:40; 7:15) — and Nehemiah, in a cognate form, at the start of his own confession (Neh. 1:6, 11). Both of those are prayers about a people in trouble for their sins, asking to be heard from far away. The pilgrim on the road up is borrowing the language of the house he is walking toward.

And the word he uses for what he is offering gives the game away before the argument begins. תַּחֲנוּנָי, my supplications, is built on חנן, to be gracious. A supplication, by its etymology, is a request for grace — not for a hearing on the merits. The man in the depths has already conceded the case he has not yet stated.

Key terms, verses 1–2
מִמַּעֲמַקִּים Out of the depths; elsewhere always of water (Ps. 69:2, 14; Isa. 51:10; Ezek. 27:34). Bare here — the psalm does not say what the water is. The Vulgate’s De profundis.
קְרָאתִיךָ Perfect: I have called thee. The psalm opens mid-cry, and from inside the depths rather than after them.
קַשֻּׁבוֹת Attentive — the rare adjective of Solomon’s dedication prayer (2 Chr. 6:40; 7:15) and, in a cognate form, Nehemiah’s (Neh. 1:6, 11).
תַּחֲנוּנָי My supplications, from חנן, to be gracious (Ps. 28:2, 6; 31:22; 143:1, another of the penitential psalms). A plea for grace by its etymology.

v. 3If thou shouldest mark iniquities

אִם־עֲוֹנוֹת תִּשְׁמָר־יָהּ

“If iniquities thou shouldest keep, Yah —”

אֲדֹנָי מִי יַעֲמֹד

“Lord, who could stand?”

The object comes first. Not if thou shouldest keep iniquities but iniquities — if thou shouldest keep them: the word is thrown to the front of the sentence and left there, which is Hebrew’s way of pointing. עֲוֹנוֹת is the crooked kind of sin, from a root meaning to bend or twist — not a stumble but a warp. Mark where it is. The psalm will pick it up again in its last line, and what happens to it there is the reason the psalm exists.

Now the verb, and it is the one to keep a finger on for the rest of the lesson. תִּשְׁמָר is from שׁמר, and the Authorised Version’s mark is a fair rendering of a wide word. It is the verb for keeping the commandments, for keeping a flock, for Adam set in the garden “to dress it and to keep it” (Gen. 2:15), for a sentry keeping a post. Its centre is not notice but retain: to guard a thing, hold it, keep it on hand. Read the question with that in it and it sharpens. The psalmist is not asking whether God sees iniquities. Of course he does. He is asking what God does with them afterwards — whether he keeps them, the way a man keeps a receipt.

Both divine names stand in this one verse, and in this order. First יָהּ, the short form of the covenant name — the Yah of Hallelu-Yah, and of the song at the sea, “the LORD is my strength and song” (Exod. 15:2). It is the form that lives in praise, and here it turns up in the psalm’s darkest sentence. Then אֲדֹנָי, my Master, which is the name a servant uses when he is about to concede something. The Authorised Version marks the change by case, which is why verse 3 reads LORD and then Lord on the same line.

מִי יַעֲמֹד — who shall stand? — is courtroom language, and the Old Testament asks it more than once, always about the same moment. “Who can stand before his indignation?” (Nah. 1:6). “Who may stand in thy sight when once thou art angry?” (Ps. 76:7). “Who shall stand when he appeareth?” (Mal. 3:2). Ezra, praying over exactly this subject, does not bother with the question mark: “we cannot stand before thee because of this” (Ezra 9:15). The New Testament gives the question its last outing at the opening of the sixth seal, from men hiding in rocks: “who shall be able to stand?” (Rev. 6:17).

The answer is nobody, and the psalm knows it, and Paul says it in so many words — “that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God” (Rom. 3:19). Which makes what happens next the most interesting thing in the psalm. Verse 4 does not answer the question. It does not say but my iniquities are few, or but thou art merciful to the deserving, or offer any of the qualifications a man in the water would be forgiven for reaching after. The question is left standing, unanswered and unanswerable, and something else is said instead.

Key terms, verse 3
עֲוֹנוֹת Iniquities — the crooked, twisted kind, from a root meaning to bend. Returns in verse 8, possessed and removed.
תִּשְׁמָר From שׁמר: keep, guard, retain, keep watch over (Gen. 2:15). Not notice but keep on file. The same root is the watchman of verse 6.
יָהּ The short covenant name — of Hallelu-Yah and of Exod. 15:2. Set by the AV in small capitals, as LORD.
מִי יַעֲמֹד Who shall stand? — the verb of the tribunal (Nah. 1:6; Ps. 76:7; Mal. 3:2; Ezra 9:15; Rev. 6:17). Paul’s answer: Rom. 3:19–20.

v. 4But there is forgiveness with thee

כִּי־עִמְּךָ הַסְּלִיחָה לְמַעַן תִּוָּרֵא

“For with thee — the forgiveness — so that thou mayest be feared.”

Four words in Hebrew, and every one of them is doing something.

Start with the first. The Authorised Version reads כִּי adversatively — but — and in effect that is right, because the sentence does overturn the verse before it. The word itself, though, is the ordinary for, because. Verse 4 is not offered as a rebuttal but as a reason, and the difference is worth a minute in the room. The psalm is not saying the record would damn you, however, there is forgiveness. It is saying nobody could stand — because forgiveness is with thee. The unanswered question and the answer that does not fit it are held together by a word meaning because, and the seam does not quite close. It is not supposed to. A man who could explain how both halves are true would not need the psalm.

Second: the word order puts עִמְּךָ, with thee, before the noun. Where the forgiveness is gets said before what it is. That is the psalm’s whole doctrine of the thing in one preposition — forgiveness is not a principle in the universe, or a policy of the courts, or a mood that comes over God on good days. It is with him, the way a possession is with its owner, and there is nowhere else to go and get it. Note the preposition and hold on to it: it comes back in verse 7.

Third, and this is the one the English cannot show: הַסְּלִיחָה carries the definite article. Not forgiveness but the forgiveness. The noun itself is rare — it stands in only two other places in the Old Testament, Nehemiah 9:17 and Daniel 9:9, and in both it is spoken of God — and the verb behind it, סלח, is never once used in the Old Testament of a man forgiving a man. Other words do that work. This word is reserved. So when the psalm puts the article on it, it is not being vague about quantity; it is naming the one thing of its kind, and saying where it is kept. Watch for the second noun with an article in verse 7, because these two are a pair.

Fourth: לְמַעַן תִּוָּרֵא, a purpose clause — in order that thou mayest be feared. Not although, not and yet: forgiveness is given the express purpose of producing fear. That sounds backwards to most modern ears, which expect forgiveness to remove fear, and it is the line most often skipped or apologised for. Solomon did not find it strange; his temple prayer asks God to “forgive, and do, and give to every man according to his ways … that they may fear thee all the days that they live” (1 Kgs. 8:39–40). Neither did Hosea, who looked forward to a people who “shall fear the LORD and his goodness” (Hos. 3:5), or Paul, for whom “the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance” (Rom. 2:4). The section on the Reformation takes this up properly, because it is also where the psalm is most often preached backwards.

One last thing about this verse, and it is a matter of what it does not say. It does not say the iniquities were not there. It does not say the record was inaccurate, or that the question of verse 3 was overwrought. It does not say how the forgiveness is possible, or what it costs, or who pays. Every one of those questions is left open, and the psalm will only begin to answer the last of them in its final line.

Key terms, verse 4
כִּי For, because. The AV’s but catches the force; the word itself makes verse 4 a reason rather than a rebuttal.
עִמְּךָ With thee. Fronted before the noun. The same preposition governs עִם־יְהוָה in verse 7.
הַסְּלִיחָה The forgiveness, with the article. The noun elsewhere only at Neh. 9:17 and Dan. 9:9, of God both times; the verb סלח never of one man forgiving another.
לְמַעַן תִּוָּרֵא That thou mayest be feared — a purpose clause, not a concession (1 Kgs. 8:39–40; Hos. 3:5; Rom. 2:4).

Part IIMore than they that watch for the morning vv. 5–8

vv. 5–6I wait; my soul waits; in his word I hope

קִוִּיתִי יְהוָה קִוְּתָה נַפְשִׁי וְלִדְבָרוֹ הוֹחָלְתִּי

“I have waited for the LORD; my soul has waited; and for his word I have hoped.”

נַפְשִׁי לַאדֹנָי מִשֹּׁמְרִים לַבֹּקֶר שֹׁמְרִים לַבֹּקֶר

“My soul — for the Lord: more than watchers for the morning, watchers for the morning.”

Two verbs of waiting, and the psalm uses both. The first, קוה, is said twice over — I have waited; my soul has waited — and the lexicons connect it with the word for a cord or a measuring line, the sense being of something stretched taut. That is the waiting of Isaiah 40:31, “they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength”: not slack, not resigned, but under tension and holding. The second, יחל, is expectant hope, and it is worth marking now because the man is about to hand it to the nation in verse 7.

This is the active face of something the October lessons have already met from the other side. Psalm 62 opened on דּוּמִיָּה, silence toward God, which is the same posture with its mouth shut; see the Psalm 62 lesson for the word itself. Waiting and silence are the two things a man does when he has stopped looking for a second option.

Then the object, and it decides what kind of religion this is. וְלִדְבָרוֹ — and for his word. Not I hope that I am forgiven, which would make the ground of hope a feeling about oneself, but I hope in what he said, which puts it outside the man altogether. The psalmist has no evidence that his iniquities are gone. He has a sentence: there is forgiveness with thee. Psalm 119 uses the identical phrase for the identical move — “my soul fainteth for thy salvation: but I hope in thy word” (Ps. 119:81) — and it is as near as the Psalter comes to saying, in advance, that faith takes its object from revelation rather than from introspection.

And now the payoff of verse 3. The watchmen of verse 6 are שֹׁמְרִים — the participle of the same root the psalm used when it asked God not to שׁמר iniquities. The Authorised Version has to say mark there and watch here, and no English reader could guess that the psalm has turned one word around on its hinge. Set the two side by side and the logic is exact: because God is not keeping watch over his sins, this man is free to keep watch for God. The whole psalm is inside that sentence.

What the watchmen are is less certain than preachers usually make it, and the uncertainty costs nothing. They may be sentries on a wall, wanting the night over; they may be the temple watch, waiting for the light that lets the morning sacrifice begin. Either way the point holds, and it is not that they are eager. It is that they are certain. No watchman has ever doubted that the morning was coming, and no watchman has ever made it come one minute earlier. That is the exact shape of the waiting the psalm is describing — entirely sure of its object, entirely unable to hurry it. Isaiah’s sentry gets the tone right: “Watchman, what of the night? … The morning cometh, and also the night” (Isa. 21:11–12).

The repetition is the last thing, and it is the detail the Authorised Version was right to keep. The Hebrew simply says watchers for the morning, watchers for the morning; the AV supplies I say, more than to make English of it, and prints the supplied words in italics. It is not a stammer. It is a man saying a thing twice because the night is long, and the Psalm 46 lesson met the other end of it — God helping his city “right early”, לִפְנוֹת בֹּקֶר, at the turning of the morning. Same dawn, from opposite sides of the wall.

Key terms, verses 5–6
קִוִּיתִי From קוה, to wait — tied by the lexicons to a stretched cord. The waiting of Isa. 40:31.
הוֹחָלְתִּי From יחל, expectant hope. The same root becomes an imperative to Israel in verse 7.
לִדְבָרוֹ For his word. The object of hope is a promise, not a feeling about oneself; the same phrase at Ps. 119:81.
שֹׁמְרִים לַבֹּקֶר Watchers for the morning, said twice — the participle of verse 3’s שׁמר. Psalm 46:5’s right early is the same dawn: see the Psalm 46 lesson.

v. 7Let Israel hope: mercy, and plenteous redemption

יַחֵל יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶל־יְהוָה כִּי־עִם־יְהוָה הַחֶסֶד וְהַרְבֵּה עִמּוֹ פְדוּת

“Let Israel hope toward the LORD; for with the LORD — the mercy — and much with him — redemption.”

The I is gone. Six verses of first person singular — I have cried, I wait, my soul waits, my soul waiteth — and from here to the end there is not one of them left. What the man learned in the water he now turns round and says to the nation, in the imperative, and the verb he uses is his own: יַחֵל is the root of verse 5’s הוֹחָלְתִּי. He is not recommending a posture he has read about.

Now collect the pair that was planted at the hinge. Verse 4 said עִמְּךָ הַסְּלִיחָה, with thee — the forgiveness. Verse 7 says עִם־יְהוָה הַחֶסֶד, with the LORD — the mercy. Same preposition, same definite article, same construction, and the second is offered as the ground of the first’s being announced to everybody. What was true where one man found it is true where a nation must look for it, and the psalm says so in the same four-word shape both times. חֶסֶד itself was a key term in the Psalm 62 lesson at 62:12, and this lesson borrows that study rather than repeating it.

Then the last clause, which raises the stakes twice. פְדוּת is not a general word for rescue: it is the purchase word, the noun of a price paid to get something back — the firstborn redeemed, the slave bought out. It stands in only a few places (Exod. 8:23; Ps. 111:9; Isa. 50:2), and putting it here says that what the psalm has been asking for is not an amnesty. Something is bought.

And it is הַרְבֵּה — plenteous, abundantly, an adverb built on the root for multiplying. It is not that the redemption is sufficient; it is that there is a great deal of it. Isaiah pairs the same root with the very verb of verse 4 and gets the psalm’s theology in three Hebrew words: “let him return unto the LORD … for he will abundantly pardon” (Isa. 55:7) — which is, literally, he will multiply to forgive. Between them, verse 4 and verse 7 say that the forgiveness is the forgiveness, that it is with him, and that there is more of it than the case requires.

Key terms, verse 7
יַחֵל Hope — verse 5’s root, now an imperative addressed to the nation.
הַחֶסֶד The mercy, with the article and the same preposition as verse 4’s the forgiveness. Studied at the Psalm 62 lesson (62:12).
פְדוּת Redemption — the purchase word, a price paid (Exod. 8:23; Ps. 111:9; Isa. 50:2). Not pardon by waiver.
הַרְבֵּה Plenteous, abundantly; cf. Isa. 55:7, יַרְבֶּה לִסְלוֹחַ, he will multiply to forgive — the same root as verse 4’s verb.

v. 8He shall redeem Israel from all his iniquities

וְהוּא יִפְדֶּה אֶת־יִשְׂרָאֵל מִכֹּל עֲוֹנֹתָיו

“And he — he will redeem Israel from all his iniquities.”

The Hebrew verb already carries its subject, so וְהוּא is not needed and is there for one reason: and he — he will redeem. The psalm ends by pointing at somebody. The one who was asked not to keep the record is himself the one who pays to have it cleared, and there is no second party anywhere in the sentence — no priest, no sacrifice named, no contribution from Israel. The verb is the one verse 7 turned into a noun, פדה again: still a purchase.

Then the word from verse 3 comes back, and what has happened to it is the point of the psalm. עֲוֹנוֹת stood at the head of the question: if iniquities thou shouldest keep. Now it is עֲוֹנֹתָיו — his iniquities, with the possessive attached, and in front of it מִכֹּל, from all. The hypothetical of verse 3 has become an admitted debt, larger and more personal than when it was first raised, and it is carried off whole. The psalm does not end by making the iniquities smaller. It ends by making the redemption bigger than all of them.

Notice the tense, because the lesson should not soften it. יִפְדֶּה is imperfect: he will redeem. The psalm closes on something not yet done. Nothing in these eight verses says the waiting is over, and the watchman is still on the wall when the last line is sung. What has changed since verse 1 is not the man’s circumstances but what he knows about the morning.

The last thing to say is the plainest, and it needs no stretching to say it. The Greek Old Testament rendered this verse he shall redeem Israel from all his iniquities, and the New Testament twice reaches for the same words. The angel names the child by it: “he shall save his people from their sins” (Matt. 1:21). Paul writes it out almost clause for clause — Christ “gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity” (Titus 2:14), the same verb, the same all, the same noun. Psalm 130 does not name him. It does something better for a lesson in October: it describes precisely the work, the price and the scope, and leaves the room to notice who did it.

Key terms, verse 8
וְהוּא And he. The pronoun is grammatically unnecessary; it is there to point.
יִפְדֶּה He will redeem — verse 7’s purchase word as a verb, and in the imperfect: not yet done.
מִכֹּל עֲוֹנֹתָיו From all his iniquities. Verse 3’s word, now possessed, quantified and wholly removed. The Greek of Titus 2:14 echoes the clause.

Luther’s Aus tiefer Not, and the Pauline psalms

The Psalm 46 lesson says in passing that Luther wrote close metrical psalms when he wanted to, and that Aus tiefer Not keeps to Psalm 130 line by line. This is where that debt gets paid. Ein feste Burg is a sermon on Psalm 46 that borrows an image and then preaches a different battle; Aus tiefer Not is the other thing Luther could do, and the difference between the two is worth showing a congregation that thinks of him as one kind of writer.

He had been at this psalm for a long time before he set it to music. His lectures on the seven penitential psalms went out in 1517 — among the first things he published — and he revised and reissued them in 1525. Asked later which psalms were his favourites, he is reported to have answered the Pauline psalms, and, pressed for the list, to have named 32, 51, 130 and 143: they teach, he said, that the forgiveness of sins is granted without the law and without works. The saying comes down through the Table Talk, which is other men’s record of his conversation rather than anything he wrote for print, and it should be quoted as what it is. What it reports is at least consistent with what he did. All four are penitential psalms, four of the seven — and it is worth noticing in the room which three he passed over. Psalms 6, 38 and 102 mostly ache. The four he kept are the four that argue.

The hymn

Luther wrote Aus tiefer Not schrei ich zu dir around 1523 and it was in print the next year, in the first Lutheran hymnals. It appears in 1524 in two forms and the difference matters: four stanzas in the Nuremberg Achtliederbuch and the Erfurt Enchiridion, and five in Johann Walter’s Wittenberg choir book, where the original second stanza is opened out into two. Use the five. The extra stanza is where the doctrine is, and a four-stanza text will leave a room wondering why the hymn is on a Reformation list at all.

The tune is Luther’s own. AUS TIEFER NOT is 87.87.887, in German bar form — two matching Stollen and a longer Abgesang — and it is Phrygian, which is why it sounds ancient and unresolved to ears trained on major and minor. It opens by dropping a fifth on the word tief, which is as plain a piece of text-painting as the sixteenth century produced; Erik Routley called the melody one of Luther’s most profound inspirations. Its earliest liturgical use was chiefly as a burial hymn, which is an inheritance from the De profundis and not an invention of Luther’s. It was sung at his own funeral at Halle on 20 February 1546; the hymnological literature also reports it at the funeral of Frederick the Wise in 1525, and that one is worth passing on as a report rather than a document.

StanzaPsalmWhat Luther does with it
Aus tiefer Not schrei ich zu dirvv. 1–3The whole first half in one stanza: the cry, then the ears — dein gnädig Ohren kehr zu mir — and then the question, wer kann, Herr, vor dir bleiben? Who can stand before thee.
Bei dir gilt nichts denn Gnad und Gunstv. 4One verse given a whole stanza, and read through Paul: die Sünde zu vergeben, and es ist doch unser Tun umsonst, auch in dem besten Leben — our doing is worth nothing, even in the best life. And the second half of the verse is kept, not trimmed: des muß dich fürchten jedermann.
Darum auf Gott will hoffen ichv. 5The waiting, with its ground named twice — auf mein Verdienst nicht bauen, not building on my merit, and die mir zusagt sein wertes Wort, what his worthy word promises me. That is לִדְבָרוֹ in German.
Und ob es währt bis in die Nachtvv. 6–7The watch kept through the dark und wieder an den Morgen — and then, in the same stanza, the turn outward: so tu Israel rechter Art. Luther puts the seam inside a stanza rather than between two.
Ob bei uns ist der Sünden vielvv. 7–8Bei Gott ist viel mehr Gnaden — with God there is much more grace. Verse 7’s הַרְבֵּה, plenteous, turned into a comparison, which is exactly what the Hebrew adverb is doing.

Spelling varies between editions and centuries; the lines above follow the common modern printing. For a public-domain English text, Catherine Winkworth’s second translation is the usual choice — “Out of the depths I cry to Thee; Lord, hear me, I implore Thee!”, made for The Chorale Book for England (1863), where it is no. 40 and keeps Luther’s metre. Her earlier Lyra Germanica version (1855) alters the metre and will not sit on Luther’s tune. Richard Massie’s “From depths of woe I raise to Thee” (1854) is plainer and closer to the German. Name whichever you use, as this lesson does.

So: what crosses over, and what does not. Almost all of the psalm crosses — the depths, the ears, the question, the forgiveness, the fear, the word, the night, the morning, Israel, and the abundance. That is a remarkably high rate for a metrical paraphrase, and it is why this hymn can be used as a setting of the psalm in a way Ein feste Burg cannot. What Luther adds is vocabulary the Hebrew does not have: Verdienst, merit, and unser Tun, our doing. Psalm 130 never mentions works. It rules them out by implication in verse 3 — a man whose record would sink him is not in a position to produce a credit — but the word never appears. Luther supplies the term the sixteenth century was arguing about and puts it where the psalm’s logic already pointed. One other import is worth naming from the pulpit if the hymn is sung: stanza 4 describes Israel as der aus dem Geist erzeuget ward, begotten of the Spirit, which is John 3 brought in to define who the Israel of verse 7 now is.

What the psalm does and does not teach

October’s heading for this psalm is justification by faith, and the heading is right about where the psalm belongs and can be made to overreach. It is worth saying both halves plainly, because a lesson that overclaims here will be caught out by anyone who reads the eight verses afterwards.

The psalm teaches, in its own words, that forgiveness is with God and nowhere else (v. 4, and the preposition is the point); that it is not earned, because verse 3 has already closed that door on everyone alive; that it rests on his word and not on the sinner’s estimate of himself (v. 5); that it produces fear rather than dissolving it (v. 4); that it is a purchase, not a waiver (v. 7, פְדוּת); and that it reaches all the iniquities of the people it reaches (v. 8). That is a great deal, and every line of it is in the text.

What the psalm does not do is use the vocabulary of imputation. It never says that the righteousness of another is reckoned to the sinner. When Paul wants that, he does not quote Psalm 130; he quotes Psalm 32 — “blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven” — and builds Romans 4:6–8 on it, on the strength of a psalm that says God does not impute sin. That psalm is on the same October list and now has a lesson of its own, which takes up the question this one leaves standing; this one should stop at its own last verse. The confessions make the same division visible. The Shorter Catechism, asked what justification is, answers with “the righteousness of Christ imputed to us, and received by faith alone” (WSC 33), and the Heidelberg, asked about the forgiveness of sins, reaches immediately for the same word — God “will graciously impute to me the righteousness of Christ” (HC 56, and Q. 60 for the whole). Psalm 130 gets a congregation to there is forgiveness with thee, and gets it there honestly. The catechisms answer the question the psalm leaves standing: how forgiveness can be with him and still reach me.

Read alongside, four references earn their place: WCF 11 and WSC 33 on justification; WCF 15 and WSC 87 on repentance unto life, which is verse 4 in catechism form — “apprehension of the mercy of God in Christ” producing grief, hatred of sin and turning; HC 56 and 60 on forgiveness and righteousness; and WCF 18 on assurance, for the waiting of verses 5 and 6, where a man is certain of the morning and has not seen it yet.

Singing Psalm 130

Eight verses, no refrain, no Selah, and nothing in it to shout. This is the shortest psalm in the October set and the easiest to sing badly, because a room will take a short psalm at a brisk pace and the whole point of verses 5 and 6 is that the night is long. Sing it slowly enough that the waiting is audible.

Metre and settings

SettingMetreNotes
Scottish Psalter (1650), Ps. 130CM (8.6.8.6)“Lord, from the depths to thee I cried.” Public domain, close to the AV, and it keeps the two things this psalm can lose: verse 4’s fear clause — “that feared thou mayest be” — and the doubled watchmen of verse 6, “I say, more than they that do watch.”
AUS TIEFER NOT — Luther’s Aus tiefer Not schrei ich zu dir (1523/24)87.87.887Not a metrical psalm but a paraphrase, and listed separately for that reason: five stanzas against the psalm’s eight verses, in Phrygian, bar form, Luther’s own tune. See the section above for the text and the English translations.
Genevan Psalter (1542), Ps. 130 — GENEVAN 1307.6.7.6 DA Dorian tune in four long lines, harmonized by Goudimel (1564). Its metre fits neither the CM psalters nor Luther, so choose it for the whole psalm or not at all.
The Book of Psalms for Worship (Crown & Covenant), 130A / 130BCheck the editionTwo settings, and not in the same metre as each other. Pick one for the season rather than alternating.
The Psalter (1912), Ps. 130Check the editionConfirm which selection your book numbers as Psalm 130 before printing an order of service.

Check metre and stanza breaks against the edition in your hands. For this psalm check one thing more: whether the setting keeps “that thou mayest be feared” at the end of verse 4. Some paraphrases drop it, or soften it to reverence, and a congregation singing the psalm without it has been handed a different psalm.

Suggested CM tunes

  • MARTYRDOM — the traditional Scottish partner for this psalm; minor, weighted, and unhurried enough for verses 5 and 6.
  • ST. MARY — old and plain, with no brightness in it to fight the text.
  • KILMARNOCK — Dougall’s tune; grave, and it carries the long vowels of “out of the depths” well.
  • BANGOR — Tans’ur; austere, and the right size for eight verses sung straight through.
  • DUNFERMLINE — the plainer option, quickly learned, for a room meeting this psalm for the first time.

Confirm the metre against your own book before printing; tune names travel between metres more often than anyone expects.

Leading suggestion

The psalm has one joint and everything depends on it, so let the singing put the joint where the psalm does. Sing verses 1 to 3 and stop. Read verse 4 aloud, one voice, without comment — the room has just sung a question that has no answer, and the answer should arrive as speech before it arrives as music. Then sing verses 4 to 8 through without a break.

Do not tidy the repetition in verse 6. A leader’s instinct is to vary the second more than they that watch for the morning, and the right instinct is the opposite: sing it the same way twice and let it be as long as it is. That is what a night on a wall is like.

If you are singing Luther’s hymn as well, sing both and say which is which. The psalm is the text; the hymn is a sixteenth-century pastor’s reading of it, and a very close one — but Verdienst and unser Tun are his words, not the psalmist’s, and a congregation is better off knowing that than not. Verse 4 is the place to point out that Luther kept the clause about fear when he could easily have let it go.

In Reformation month this is the third of the October psalms, and the three belong together in a way worth saying aloud. Psalm 46 is sung from inside a city that will not be moved; Psalm 62 is sung by a man being quietly pushed, who finds that God is the only thing that will bear weight; Psalm 130 is sung from under the water by a man whose trouble is himself. A fortress, a rock, and a debt — and the same God in all three. If the month allows only one of them, this is the one that gets furthest down.

The psalm’s own settings, recordings and music sheets are collected on its psalter page, with recordings here, as they are added.

Music sheets

More settings of Psalm 130 in the library →

Audio and video

Recordings of Psalm 130 in the library →